January 13, 2010

Every Film I Saw Theatrically In 2009, Ranked In Preferential Order


Every Film I Saw Theatrically In 2009, Ranked In Preferential Order
Words Written by Dirk Calloway
  1. Avatar (3D)
  2. Up (3D)
  3. Where the Wild Things Are
  4. Fantastic Mr. Fox
  5. Watchmen
  6. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
  7. The Hangover
  8. District 9
  9. JCVD
  10. Ponyo
  11. State of Play
  12. Synecdoche, New York
  13. Defiance
  14. An Education
  15. Inglourious Basterds
  16. Separation City
  17. Star Trek
  18. The Secret Life of Bees
  19. 2012
  20. Zombieland
  21. (500) Days of Summer
  22. Public Enemies
  23. Sherlock Holmes
  24. Away We Go
  25. A Serious Man
  26. Duplicity
  27. This Is It
  28. Hotel for Dogs
  29. RiP: A Remix Manifesto
  30. Surrogates
  31. Taking Woodstock
  32. Terminator Salvation
  33. The Spirit
  34. G.I. JOE: The Rise Of Cobra
  35. Confessions of a Shopaholic
  36. Fast & Furious
  37. Transporter 3
  38. Underworld: Rise of the Lycans
  39. 12 Rounds
  40. Bruno
  41. Under the Mountain
  42. Big Stan
  43. I Love You, Beth Cooper
  44. Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience
  45. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
  46. Seven Pounds
I saw 46 films in a cinema this year. Because I saw a few twice - Watchmen, Star Trek, District 9, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - I came very close to seeing one film per week, throughout 2009. Combine that total with the amount I saw on DVD and it's probable that I spent nearly an extra 300 hours of my life watching films. 

There are a few conspicuous absences: Moon, Let The Right One In and X-Men Origins: Wolverine. I'm fairly certain the latter is pants, so I didn't bother to endorse it with my $16. I'd have watched the other two if they'd been screened in more than one boutique cinema in my home-town. That theatre decided to screen them at either inconveniently late times, or during work-hours. Their decision was no doubt based on the fact that staunch genre fans would make the effort, regardless of timings. Well, I say, screw 'em! If a film's good, promote the hell out of it, and schedule it for a time when the largest possible audience can see it.

We've a real problem on our hands with the silo'd world of boutique theatres. They've misguidedly pigeon-holed their audience as mid-40s women who drag their husbands / friends to anything that has subtitles or a small budget or what I have begun to call a "mid-concept" plot. The same demographic has misguidedly decided that it won't be caught dead at a multiplex in a mall, regardless of the quality of films screening there. The two groups are mutually reinforcing themselves into an endless loop of movies that feature any of the below:
  • a bumbling assassin
  • women who must band together doing something folksy (cooking and gardening, usually) to shake off their midlife blues
  • a Westerner interacting with "world culture" and learning its many pleasured joys
  • a soundtrack that regularly lapses into accordion playing, regardless of the film's nationality
  • a broken family unit that lives together in a grim decorated apartment block, before an outside arrives and adds colour to their world... then the outside leaves again
  • anti-American / anti-globalisation sentiments that uphold the conservative rural way of life as the only virtuous existence
  • two or three dancing scenes, no matter how needless their inclusion be
  • a running time that is no shorter than 110 minutes
  • a period setting of the mid-90s or late-80s, without any real need for it
  • a dog that acts as comic relief
Now I don't want you to think that I'm bashing on the "arthouse scene," but I need to remind you that 2009 was an amazing year for multiplex fare. Directors like JJ Abrams, James Cameron and Spike Jonze injected real smarts into their big budget extravaganzas. Directors like Zac Snyder and David Fincher poured their hearts into their projects and somehow made them into works of digital art (even if Watchmen and Benjamin Button were an hour too long for most people's tastes).

This was the year where, hopefully, everyone saw at least one 3D movie. If you haven't yet, book a ticket for Avatar. I hear there might be a session that's not sold out, um, sometime next week.

One small gripe: The Hurt Locker never made it to my town. I've seen a copy, though I won't repeat the methods I employed to do so. Rest assured, I am so fond of that film that if it had been screened nearby, Avatar's position on this list would be threatened.

At the other end of the spectrum, Will Smith might be tempted to go into hiding after the disastrous three-peat of I Am Legend, Hancock and Seven Pounds. Here's hoping that 2010 is a better year for The Fresh Prince.

5 comments:

  1. F. M. F > Watchmen > D9 > Zombieland > Avatar > Benj But > Sherlock Holmes. Fact!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi there Anonymous. Good to see you here. I see we've a 72% agreement on ranking. Exciting. You can stay.

    Also worthy of comment is the fact we're 100% in our ranking of Avatar > Benjamin Button > Sherlock Holmes.

    I've a rivetting essay on the way about why Sherlock Holmes is the best Saw movie ever made. I bet you can't wait!

    ReplyDelete
  3. An interesting list sir. One small gripe: you haven't made it to Let the Right One In or Moon (which is still on...) but you saw The Jonas Brothers?! The Jonas Bros. In 3D no less.
    You make an intersting point re: boutique cinemas and their choices of films. I'd be keen to read any more you have to say on the matter...
    I am also pissed Hurt Locker is still not out here. You can get it on DVD for Swayze's sake!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey there Andy. Dunno if you know this, but I've been reviewing for a local film website about Flicks. Hence: Jonas Brothers, 12 Rounds and other such films that I may not have paid money to see otherwise! Heh. There's still time for Moon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey there Dirk, I'll gladly stay should further posts provide for titillating reading.

    Anonymous

    ReplyDelete

Before you comment here, remember... sic transit gloria.